![]() The remote web server does not set an X-Frame-Options response header or a Content-Security-Policy 'frame-ancestors' response header in all content responses. The remote web server may fail to mitigate a class of web application vulnerabilities. Web Application Potentially Vulnerable to Clickjacking My purpose of opening this ticket is to find if this is a real vulnerability, and how to prevent it if it is. My understanding is that it could allow the cockpit page to be loaded into an iframe and click jacking works by having an invisible page over the cockpit page to take the clicks instead of getting them to the cockpit page, which would allow them to perform malicious behaviors. I had the result of a Nessus scan, which showed the potential vulnerability in the report. embed a cockpit frame into a page from a different origin, and make it actually work? So can you actually exploit this right now? I.e. ![]() It looks like embedding cockpit across different origins silently broke some unknown time ago (whether this is due to new browser restrictions or some regression in cockpit-ws I can't say yet). I tested this on RHEL 8.4, 8.5, and Fedora 34.Įmbedding currently works as part of a cockpit web page (like on embed-cockpit example) for the same domain - but as soon as I choose a different one like 127.0.0.2:9091 (our test VMs), it fails:Ĭontent Security Policy: The page’s settings blocked the loading of a resource at (“default-src”).Īll our Cockpit pages have this relatively strict C-S-P. PAM works, but the web page immediately goes back to the login screen without an error message. I select in the input line, then "full server", and try to log in. Since most flights are now long haul flights lasting more than 8 hours, the cockpit must be comfortable, stress free and yet complete with all indications and controls.I tried to run python3 -m rver in, and opened. It also takes into account the fact that pilots of both genders are now common. In modern day cockpit design, much attention is paid to the ease of use and comfort of use which is called the ‘ergonomics’. Graphical Interfaces (like windows in computers) give the pilot the freedom to select the indications that he needs at a given time which reduces the need for a large an unbearable number of physical indicators (picture source:) This enables both pilots to have independent indication while increasing reliability in case of failure of one of them.Ĭockpit of an Airbus 380. In large planes there is room for both pilot and the co-pilot to sit and certain indicators are duplicated. Due to the increases risk of hijacking and other unlawful activities, now all commercial airlines restrict access to the cockpit and have a lockable door which the pilot can open only to admit personnel on need basis. But in larger planes it was typical to have a door between the cockpit and the cabin area so that only authorized personnel like the cabin crew can enter the cockpit. all of which must be maintained within a specified range.Ĭockpit of a modern large plane (picture source:In the very early days and also in small planes there was no physical separation between the cockpit and the cabin. Apart from the indicators that provide navigation information the instrument panel also has status indicators like engine temperature, fuel pressure etc. ![]() The pilot sitting in the cockpit completes the loop by observing the indicators and maneuvering the controls so as to navigate the plane on the desired path. Then it also contains the controls that the pilot uses to maneuver the plane. It also has the front end of the radio communication equipment the pilot uses to communicate with ground and other aircraft. The cockpit contains an instrument panel which has a large number of indicators that provide vital information to the pilot that are required to navigate the plane. It is located right at the front of the plane allowing the pilot an unrestricted view of the front.Ĭockpit of a small light plane (picture source:) The origin of this word is debatable but one reason for its initial use could have been that the flight deck is a very small crammed area just like the small space used for ‘cock fighting’ in the early days. The more appropriate or correct word is ‘flight deck’. The area in the plane from which the pilot controls the aircraft is commonly called the ‘cockpit’. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |