![]() ![]() I argue, utilizing Malabou's concept of plasticity, that this disruption may be recovered. However, out of the differences between the examples the by-play induces another law, the law of non-mediation, which may, in Derrida's view, actually negate the dialectical movement towards universality. Within this by-play, the universal concept, its law, is supposed to be mediated and determined. I argue that particularity can be taken as exemplarity of this kind, oscillating between a singular example and a universal paradigm. This play of accidental moments, however, is not entirely free it generates a series that ultimately leads to an example in the second sense, to an exemplary individual. A Beispiel in the first sense can be replaced by another instance in a free play. Hegel uses ‘example’ in three senses: it means ‘instance’, ‘illustration’, or ‘model’, ‘exemplary (. As Derrida's analyses make apparent, the ‘structure of exemplarity’ in Hegel is quite intricate. The problem with these accounts is that they reduce particularity either to singularity or to universality. Two main accounts of particularity have been advanced: the particular as an example or instance and the particular as a subjective perspective on a universal concept. Understanding Hegel's account of particularity has proven to be anything but straightforward. In the final section, I will briefly discuss some of the open questions of Engels’ natural dialectics. Then, I will delve into the general outlines of Engels’ dialectics and focus on his intentions, tasks, and purposes in pursuing dialectics in some of his prominent works on this theme from 1870s to 1880s, most notably in Anti-Dühring and the Dialectics of Nature. In Engels’ case, this irony is captured by the phrase “the Engels problem.” In this chapter, I will first briefly summarize what “the Engels problem” is about and lay out its connection to the reception his tory of Engels’ dialectics. ) as a major distortion of that tradition. It is curious and ironic that a theoretical contribution to an intellectual tradi tion within the history of European political philosophy could be perceived and depicted (. Yet there is one particular component of the Marxist body of thought that has been subject to a group of controversies for quite some time for which Engels is usually held responsible: dialectics and dialectics of nature. Engels’ name stands and falls today with a variety of his contributions to socialist thought and Marxist philosophy. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |